The beauty of having your own blog is that you can make comments unsullied, as it were, by the silly comments of trolls and wannabees.
On another board presumably devoted to the Paul replaced mystery, a person has logged on claiming to be a relative of the designer of the Sgt. Pepper drumskin. She did some genealogical research, she says, and she says that her grandfather couldn't have possibly placed a clue on the drumskin.
My guess is that this is a kick-off of an idea (a plan?) to discredit the legitimate information that has been collected concerning the replacement of Paul McCartney.
I wouldn't believe her.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
There are people who believe Paul McCartney was permanently replaced in 1966. I'm one of them. What happened to him? That's what this blog will explore.
Search This Blog
Followers
Blog Archive
About This Blog
- paulumbo
- For original Beatles fans, 1966 was a strange year. The "Butcher" cover and John's "more popular than Jesus" comment signaled that something was wrong with The Beatles. By 1967, we heard a different voice than Paul's on Penny Lane and we saw a different face in photos. Most of us abandoned Beatle fandom. In 1969, the "Paul is Dead" clues surfaced and were so strong and consistent, that many people wondered if that was the answer to the puzzling changes in Paul's voice and looks. People have been looking into that possibility from 1969-on but have not been able to document what happened to Paul. My generation deserves to know the truths about the group that we loved and made famous. So the search is on . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment